<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Code-Quality on CuraDevOps</title><link>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/tags/code-quality/</link><description>Recent content in Code-Quality on CuraDevOps</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 11:18:28 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/tags/code-quality/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>GitHub Actions gets dedicated path for Code Quality/CodeQL runs</title><link>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-21-separate-github-actions-path-for-github-code-quality/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 11:18:28 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-21-separate-github-actions-path-for-github-code-quality/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Platform/SRE — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>CI/CD — Plan:&lt;/strong> If you use CodeQL in GitHub Actions, evaluate adopting the new dedicated workflow path to improve run-history clarity and accurate usage reporting — no deadline, but worth scheduling as routine pipeline hygiene.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Signals:&lt;/strong> GA announcement&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item><item><title>GitHub org Code Quality dashboard gains Trends tab</title><link>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-20-track-organization-code-quality-trends/</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 11:19:17 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-20-track-organization-code-quality-trends/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Platform/SRE — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>CI/CD — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> The new Trends tab surfaces org-wide code quality movement over time rather than a point-in-time snapshot, which could inform how leaders set and track quality standards across teams — no decision required, but useful context for platform strategy reviews.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item><item><title>GitHub Code Quality stops auto-requesting Copilot reviews on PRs</title><link>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-09-github-code-quality-no-longer-adds-copilot-as-a-reviewer/</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 11:24:01 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-09-github-code-quality-no-longer-adds-copilot-as-a-reviewer/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Platform/SRE — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>CI/CD — Learn:&lt;/strong> Teams using GitHub Code Quality should check whether existing rulesets that auto-requested Copilot reviews are still in place or have been silently removed; review PR workflow expectations accordingly.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item><item><title>GitHub adds AI-generated code coverage workflow setup in Code Quality settings</title><link>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-04-code-coverage-automatic-enablement-in-code-quality-settings/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 12:54:10 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-04-code-coverage-automatic-enablement-in-code-quality-settings/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Platform/SRE — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>CI/CD — Learn:&lt;/strong> GitHub now offers AI-generated coverage workflow setup from repository Code Quality settings, reducing onboarding friction; worth evaluating if teams struggle to bootstrap coverage, but no pipeline migration is required.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item><item><title>GitHub Code Quality reaches GA on Enterprise Cloud and Team</title><link>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-21-github-code-quality-is-now-generally-available/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:20:39 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-21-github-code-quality-is-now-generally-available/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Platform/SRE — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>CI/CD — Plan:&lt;/strong> New GA GitHub feature worth evaluating for pipeline quality gates; assess whether Code Quality checks should be integrated into existing GitHub Actions workflows this quarter.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> GA release of a GitHub-native code quality tool that may reduce the need for third-party static analysis seats; worth tracking as a build-vs-buy data point at next toolchain review.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Signals:&lt;/strong> GA announcement&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item><item><title>GitHub Code Quality license estimate in public preview</title><link>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-14-github-code-quality-license-estimate-in-public-preview/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 12:06:40 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-14-github-code-quality-license-estimate-in-public-preview/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Platform/SRE — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>CI/CD — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> Pre-GA feature that surfaces active-committer counts to estimate Code Quality licensing costs; worth monitoring as it approaches GA before making any GitHub Advanced Security / Code Quality budget decisions.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Signals:&lt;/strong> pre-GA (alpha/beta/RC/preview)&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>