CuraDevOps

tag: Code-Scanning · 12 items

2026-10-28 · GitHub Changelog · source ↗ #github-copilot#code-scanning#security
  • Platform/SRE — Skip
  • CI/CD — Learn: This public preview extension lets engineers triage code scanning alerts inside the Copilot app; worth evaluating as a developer experience improvement, but it’s pre-GA so no pipeline action needed yet.
  • Leader — Skip
2026-10-15 · GitHub Changelog · source ↗ #github-actions#code-scanning#supply-chain
  • Platform/SRE — Skip
  • CI/CD — Plan: GitHub’s AI Scan for PRs is now GA, extending code vulnerability detection to languages and frameworks CodeQL doesn’t cover — evaluate enabling it in your GitHub Actions workflows this quarter to broaden supply-chain security coverage.
  • Leader — Plan: GA availability makes this worth adding to your security standards: assess whether to mandate AI Scan alongside CodeQL as part of the org’s golden-path security policy for pull requests.
  • Signals: GA announcement
  • Platform/SRE — Skip
  • CI/CD — Plan: This GA feature can automatically remediate code scanning alerts within your GitHub workflows, reducing manual triage burden. Evaluate enabling it on repositories that use GitHub Advanced Security to tighten the security feedback loop in your pipelines.
  • Leader — Learn: GitHub’s agentic autofix moves automated security remediation from a developer convenience into a pipeline-integrated capability, which could reshape how teams handle vulnerability backlog — worth tracking as AI-driven developer tooling matures, but no immediate strategic decision is required.
  • Signals: GA announcement
2026-10-14 · GitHub Changelog · source ↗ #github#code-scanning#audit-log
  • Platform/SRE — Skip
  • CI/CD — Learn: New audit trail for manual dismissals and reopenings of code quality findings; useful context if your org needs traceability around scan results, but no pipeline change required.
  • Leader — Learn: Strengthens governance visibility over code quality finding management at the org/enterprise level — worth noting if compliance or audit requirements touch your security scanning program.
2026-10-13 · GitHub Changelog · source ↗ #github#code-scanning#security
  • Platform/SRE — Skip
  • CI/CD — Learn: New AI Scan metrics in GitHub’s security overview give pipeline owners visibility into how many AI-generated findings are being surfaced and resolved in PRs — worth reviewing if your org uses GitHub Advanced Security.
  • Leader — Learn: Org and enterprise admins can now track AI Scan effectiveness in security overview, providing data to assess whether GitHub Advanced Security’s AI features are delivering measurable vulnerability reduction.
2026-10-06 · GitHub Changelog · source ↗ #github-actions#code-scanning#security
  • Platform/SRE — Skip
  • CI/CD — Learn: GitHub org/enterprise admins can now see which repos have AI Scan for PRs enabled in the security overview — useful context when auditing pipeline security coverage, but no pipeline change required.
  • Leader — Learn: This visibility feature lets platform leaders quickly assess AI-assisted code scanning adoption across repos, supporting supply-chain security posture reviews at the org or enterprise level.
2026-10-01 · GitHub Changelog · source ↗ #github-actions#code-scanning#security
  • Platform/SRE — Skip
  • CI/CD — Learn: GitHub’s scheduled code scanning now requires a prior push or PR to activate weekly scans, which may silently drop coverage on dormant repos; review which repos rely on scheduled-only scanning to avoid gaps.
  • Leader — Skip
2026-09-16 · GitHub Changelog · source ↗ #code-scanning#github-actions#security
  • Platform/SRE — Skip
  • CI/CD — Learn: AI Scan can now be enabled on repos that haven’t configured CodeQL default setup, lowering the barrier to adding automated security scanning to pull request workflows — worth revisiting if teams have been blocked on CodeQL prerequisites.
  • Leader — Skip
2026-09-11 · GitHub Changelog · source ↗ #github-actions#code-scanning#api
  • Platform/SRE — Skip
  • CI/CD — Learn: Public preview API for programmatic control of GitHub’s AI code scanning on PRs — worth tracking for future pipeline integration, but not actionable until GA.
  • Leader — Skip
  • Signals: pre-GA (alpha/beta/RC/preview)
2026-08-21 · GitHub Changelog · source ↗ #code-scanning#github#security
  • Platform/SRE — Skip
  • CI/CD — Learn: New dismissal reason in GitHub Code Scanning lets teams mark alerts as mitigated by external controls (e.g., WAF), reducing noise without falsely closing vulnerabilities — worth noting if you manage GHAS alert triage workflows.
  • Leader — Skip
2026-08-06 · GitHub Changelog · source ↗ #github-actions#code-scanning#supply-chain
  • Platform/SRE — Skip
  • CI/CD — Plan: If your org uses GitHub code scanning default setup, evaluate adopting the new github-codeql-config-file repository property to standardize CodeQL scan behavior across repos without per-repo overrides.
  • Leader — Plan: This enables centralized enforcement of code scanning standards across the org’s repositories — worth incorporating into the golden path or security policy for teams already on GitHub Advanced Security.
2026-07-15 · GitHub Changelog · source ↗ #github-actions#security#code-scanning
  • Platform/SRE — Skip
  • CI/CD — Plan: GitHub’s AI-powered security detections now surface on PRs for languages CodeQL doesn’t cover — worth enabling to broaden supply-chain and vulnerability coverage in existing GitHub Actions workflows.
  • Leader — Learn: Expanded AI security coverage on PRs broadens GitHub’s appeal as a unified code-security platform, relevant if evaluating whether GitHub Advanced Security covers the org’s language portfolio.