<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Git-Scalability on CuraDevOps</title><link>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/tags/git-scalability/</link><description>Recent content in Git-Scalability on CuraDevOps</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:52:16 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/tags/git-scalability/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>GitLab argues Git needs a rebuild for AI-agent scale</title><link>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-27-git-was-built-for-humans-agents-need-an-upgrade/</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 20:52:16 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-08-27-git-was-built-for-humans-agents-need-an-upgrade/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Platform/SRE — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>CI/CD — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> GitLab&amp;rsquo;s own data — 40% more CI/CD pipelines, 50% more code pushes, 500% larger codebases over one year — frames why agent-scale SCM is a near-term architectural concern; worth tracking as a signal when evaluating long-term SCM platform direction, though no vendor-neutral decision is actionable yet.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>