<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Retrospective on CuraDevOps</title><link>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/tags/retrospective/</link><description>Recent content in Retrospective on CuraDevOps</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:00:57 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/tags/retrospective/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Twenty years of DevOps: a critical retrospective</title><link>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-10-what-twenty-years-of-devops-has-failed-to-do/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:00:57 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://curadevops.metacog.co.kr/insights/2026-07-10-what-twenty-years-of-devops-has-failed-to-do/</guid><description>&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Platform/SRE — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>CI/CD — Skip&lt;/strong>&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Leader — Learn:&lt;/strong> A Honeycomb-authored retrospective arguing DevOps has fallen short of its goals — worth reading to pressure-test org strategy and cultural assumptions, though it carries a vendor perspective.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>